Attacking Transitions: When to Risk and When to Retain
We think you will hear a lot more about quick attacking transitions in the coming weeks, particularly in the Premier League with managers like Xabi Alonso now in the mix.
In Arsenal's game yesterday, we saw signs of their approach developing too. Alongside retaining possession after a regain, there was a real willingness to risk the ball and attack at speed.
Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. Attacking quickly can exploit an opponent before they recover, but it increases the risk of losing possession. Retaining the ball allows you to establish control, but can give the opposition time to reorganise. The best teams and coaches know when to do which, and that decision can be coached.
We have two collections that explore exactly this.
Risk the Ball
Our attacking transition collection looks at how to coach quick transitions after regaining possession, building from technical practices through to full sessions. If you want your players attacking at speed and understanding when to go, this is where to start.
Retain the Ball
Fourteen practices and growing, focused on what players should do when retaining possession is the better decision after a regain. We will be building this into a full collection as we add more sessions.
Risk or Retain: Decision Making
This is where it comes together. Ten full sessions, three practices in each, designed to help players recognise what the game demands when possession is regained and make better decisions in those moments.
Risk or Retain | Full Sessions
When your team wins the ball, do you encourage them to attack immediately or secure possession first? Drop your thoughts below 👊
Replied on Alonso's Chelsea: The 3-4-3 Press
07 Sep 17:37
Thibaut R.
Yes, exactly, Thibaut. 👍🏻
For me it’s less about the starting formation and more about what the opposition actually becomes out of possession and where the spaces appear. Against an aggressive 4-3-3, I think there’s definitely an opportunity for the full-back to roll inside the wide forward’s press. That can give your 10 and wide forward really good options to offer around, while the full-back moving inside can also create the extra player and potential overload in midfield. If they follow him inside, you potentially open the outside. If they don’t, you can find the overload centrally.But again, for me flexibility is key. I wouldn’t want the full-back automatically inverting every time just because we’re playing against a 4-3-3. Sometimes roll inside, sometimes stay outside, sometimes arrive later. Keep changing the picture and asking the opposition different questions.Ultimately, the more predictable our positioning becomes, the easier we are to defend.
I want enough structure to create advantages, but enough flexibility to keep surprising the opposition. 👍🏻